I provide consulting across program development, policy, quality assurance, and strategic enrolment and portfolio planning. This may include the design of new programs, renewal of existing offerings, development of review frameworks, policy modernization, and preparation for external review or accreditation.

Engagements usually begin with an initial conversation to understand the context, scope, and priorities of the work. From there, I propose an approach that aligns with institutional timelines, governance processes, and available resources.

Engagements vary depending on the scope of the work. This may include focused in-person, hybrid or remote advisory support, defined project work, or longer-term collaboration. In all cases, the work is structured, documented, and aligned with institutional processes and decision-making frameworks.

No - every institution and project has unique needs. You might only need additional eyes on a ministry-bound document, or you might need someone to facilitate a planning session or a series of sessions with your team or you may have a long term project lasting sever months. There are no set expectations on project length.

Work is scoped based on the complexity, duration, and level of involvement required. Engagements may be structured as project-based work, hourly advisory support, or ongoing retainer arrangements.

My work focuses on the alignment of programs, policy, and quality assurance as interconnected systems, supporting clarity and consistency across curriculum, governance, and learner experience. This is informed by formal training in academic program evaluation and portfolio strategy, as well as extensive experience navigating the complexity of institutional contexts, including faculty, administration, staff, and external regulatory bodies.

Engagements are collaborative, structured, and grounded in institutional context. I work closely with academic leaders, faculty, and staff to ensure that approaches are practical, aligned with governance processes, and responsive to local priorities. The work is iterative and transparent, with a focus on building clarity and shared understanding at each stage.